【黃一包養價格開國】歷代公羊學異義

Content summary: Gongyang School has been continuously exposed by ancient Gongyang scholars since the Han Dynasty, but there are many differences in this. For example, regarding the predecessors in the construction of Gongyang, whether “Gongyang” can be a student of the Gongyang family, Dong Zhongshu said that He Xiu explained whether Wang Yuanyue was correct by Zhou Yu, whether Zhuang Cun and the founder of the modern literary school in the Qing Dynasty, whether Huang Zizhen and Wei Yuan could have discussed the eleven more important differences through the list of eleven more important differences, and gave clear answers to some of these differences.

Keywords: Rams/Era/Extraordinary

[Note]

In more than 20 years of studying the Age Ram, the author has found that there are many differences in the historical materials and theoretical readings related to the Age Ram. Some of the differences are now listed in the basic concepts of Age Ram to teach them.

1. “Gongyang” originated from Zixia and Zengzi’s people of the seventy sons

The final source of “Gongyang” is the “Xiaoshu·The Decision of the Destiny”, “The Preface of Dai Hong of Donghan,” and He Xiu’s interpretation of “Gongyang” also originated from Zixia with “Gongyang”. It can be proved that “Gongyang” comes from the cooperation of Zixia Neng as a Gongyang Age of Donghan, and later became a trendy point in the academic world.

But the three legends of Hao Du from the Yuan Dynasty all came from Zeng Zi’s words, and put forward different meanings on the age of the Yangs from Zixia. Hao Du believed that Zixia passed on Confucius’ “Year” alone to teach Gong Yang Gao, but he did not trust him. “Gongyang Festival” records many pioneers, but they have not introduced Zixia at once. If Zixia is the source of the Gongyang Festival, they will not be able to record Zixia at once. Hao Du’s opinion must be convincing. He further pointed out that Zixia said that for the sake of writing, the most basic and untrustworthy statement was. The account of Wu Zixia in “The Legend of the Ram” is a coincidence, and it is not impossible to deny Zixia’s teaching of “Year”.

In this way, the three news proposed by Hao Du are all based on Zengzi’s statement, which is based on the five quotes of “Gongyang Biography”, and Luzi is Zengzi’s copying error. “The Ram” does not mean five times, but six times lead to Luzi, who is undoubtedly the character with the most quotes in “The Ram”. However, in the classics such as “The Book of Songs” and “Mencius”, there is no record of Luzi, and Zengzi has been mentioned several times in “The Book of Songs” and “Mencius”, so Hao Du suspected that this Luzi refers to Zengzi. Zengzi was mistaken for Luzi because he was near the shape of the two characters. However, it was once said that Lu’s ability was not very powerful, which was comparable to what Hao Du said about fish as Lu. At the same time, there is no ability to make mistakes, and no ability to make mistakes in all six areas, especially Zengzi is a famous figure among the seventy sons. If it were not for the fact that it was Luzi in “The Ram” and it would be hard to imagine that the six places mistakenly replaced Zengzi with the unknown Luzi. Although Hao’s arguments are certainly valid, Zeng Zi is sure to have a certain relationship with “Year”. Dong Zhongshu said in “Year Fanlu·Yu Xu”: “The way of “Year Fan” is to get the king and the small ones are to dominate. Therefore, Zeng Zi and Zi Shi Sheng are beautiful and beautiful. Hou An and respect the emperor.” [1]363

The book only conveys Zixia. Hao said that it is from Zeng Zi, and there is no Guan Zixia, which is all a single word. According to Dong Zhongshu’s “Year Fanlu·Yu Xu”, in addition to baoqingZixia and Zengzi, Kong Houzi also had Zixiang, Guziquan, and Gongjianzi related to “Year”: “Zixiang, Guzi, and Gongjianzi said that they were close, but they were the national resources. It was so important, but as for killing the king and destroying the country, they were unable to protect the country. The reason was that they were all unaware of the Tao and did not see “Year”.”[1]356Among the Seventy Sons, there are not only one person who has published “Year”; at most, there are Zixia, Zengzi, Zixiang, Guzi, and Gongshangzi. The Seventy Sons’ doorman mentioned in “Year Fanlu·Yu Xu” is also the main contributor of “Year Yang”. Sima said: “As for those who are like Xun Qing, Mencius, Gong Sungu, and Korean Fei, they often write books on “Year” and write books, which will not be successful.” [2] From this we can see that in the pre-Qin dynasty, in addition to the seventy sons and their later studies, those who passed on “Year” in the pre-Qin period also included Mencius, Xunzi, Korean Sungu, Gong Sungu and others and a large number of talents who were born in the door. It is impossible to limit the inheritance of the age of Yangs in the pre-Qin period to Zixia, Zengzi and others.

2. “Gongyang” is the result of learning the pioneers

There are 15 records about pioneers and friends in “Gongyang”. The ancestors recorded in “Gongyang Biography” include Zi Shenzi, Zi Gongyangzi, Zi Simazi, descendants, and Zibeigongzizi, but not as good as Zixia and Zengzi. However, the ancestors recorded in “Gongyang Fanlu” include Zixia, Zengzi, Zicheng, Jadezi, Gongjianzi, Prince, Zichi, and Zishi. Except for the prince, who is the world’s generation, Zichi is not detailed, Zishi has other disputes [1] 364, Zixia, Zengzi, Zicheng, Jadezi, and Gongjianzi are all characters of the seventy sons.

These pioneers of the “Generation Ram” in Chi, Zhu Yizun, believed that they could be the same as Zixia’s door students. [3] However, from about 350 years to Zixia to Yangshen, the predecessors recorded in “Age Ram” cannot be a unified one. There can be differences between these predecessors. However, although there are reports of the predecessors such as Yangshen in “Rams”, there is no explanation for inheriting the lineage. The first sequence of the “Gongyang” was from Dai Hong in Donghan. He Xiu’s “Interpretation” also believed that the inheritance of “Gongyang” became the “Gongyang” that the “Gongyang” was a five-generation grant between father and son. There is a clear problem in this statement. “The Complete Collection of Four Library Books” already points out that “The Ram” does not produce the Ram. Cui Ying of the late Qing Dynasty also suspected that “The Resurrection of Age: Preface” was written by the Gongyang family. The ancient-doubted Jian Qian Xuantong even believed that “it was created by the people of Donghan” [4]. Xu Xie also believed that Dai Hong’s Gongyang inheritance was “repellent” [5]. But Cui Xingxiu and Xu Xieguan both did not explain why Dai Hong created a lineage with the Gongyang clan.

This is closely related to the title of “The Ram”. The name of “Gongyang Biography” begins with the writings of Gongyang Bi and Hu Wusheng as bamboo and silk. Gongyang Biography and Hu Wusheng have a relationship with Master Sheng. Hu Wusheng respects his master and named it “Gongyang Biography”. However, “Gongyang” is not a family-learning transcript of Gongyang’s family, but a copy of “Generation” from the Warring States Period. In the war, the place where the country is 博取三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三� “Gongyang” is not a study of the Gongyang family, but the result of “Year”. It was created by Gongyangzi, Beimingzi, Shenzi and other pioneers. Originally, like “ZhiPen” and “ZhiPen” by Qi, it sh